Super Nuke Bros. Forum

The forum of the highly anticipated Flash game "Super Nuke Bros. Melee".
 
HomeHome  CalendarCalendar  FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  MemberlistMemberlist  UsergroupsUsergroups  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  

Share | 
 

 US detainee interrogation: a road not taken

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
Mr007
Neutral Nuke Brother


Number of posts : 30
Registration date : 2010-12-24

PostSubject: US detainee interrogation: a road not taken   Sat Dec 25, 2010 12:38 pm

The development of Bush Administration policies on the treatment of suspected terrorist detainees was probed yesterday at a Senate Judiciary Committee subcommittee hearing, which also led to the release of two primary source documents reflecting internal Bush Administration deliberations.

Former State Department Counselor Philip Zelikow described his efforts in 2005-6 to advance a standard that would effectively prohibit “cruel, inhuman, and degrading” treatment of detainees, a standard to which, in theory, the United States was already committed. But the practice was something different, he said.

“The U.S. government adopted an unprecedented program of cooly calculated dehumanizing abuse and physical torment to extract information,” Mr. Zelikow testified (pdf). “This was a mistake, perhaps a disastrous one. It was a collective failure, in which a number of officials and members of Congress (and staffers), of both parties played a part, endorsing a CIA program of physical coercion even after the McCain amendment was passed and after the Hamdan decision. Precisely because this was a collective failure it is all the more important to comprehend it, and learn from it.”

Mr. Zelikow cited two noteworthy official documents in his testimony, though these were not published on the Judiciary Committee web site. Copies were obtained by Secrecy News.

A June 2005 memorandum prepared by Mr. Zelikow and Gordon R. England, the acting deputy secretary of defense, proposed a comprehensive approach to detention, interrogation and prosecution of suspected terrorists, that the authors said would be compatible with existing legal standards. But their approach was rejected by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Mr. Zelikow recalled in his testimony. The memorandum was reported in the New York Times (Tim Golden, “Detainee Memo Created Divide in White House,” October 1, 2006) and elsewhere was quoted at length in Angler by Barton Gellman (at pp. 347-349), but the document itself has not been made publicly available until now. See Elements of a Possible Initiative, June 12, 2005.

A second memorandum, authored by Mr. Zelikow and John Bellinger, offered an alternative legal framework predicated on acceptance of the prohibition against “cruel, inhuman, and degrading” treatment. See Detainees - the Need for a Stronger Legal Framework, July 2005.

By 2006, the terms of the dispute had shifted. The Administration affirmed the prohibition against “cruel, inhuman, and degrading” treatment, but then embraced an Office of Legal Counsel argument that said the CIA interrogation program, including water boarding and the rest, did not violate the prohibition. Zelikow’s February 2006 critique of the OLC interpretation is said to be undergoing declassification review. Since the classification status of that critique is entirely derivative of the now-declassified OLC memos, its full and prompt declassification is to be expected.

Thanks to Stephen Aftergood and FAS for covering this issue. Copyright remains with the aforementioned.

Swooper Flags
dvds
Back to top Go down
View user profile
 
US detainee interrogation: a road not taken
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» LMS Round 8 - Road America - Discussion Thread
» [nK F1800 CHAMP] THE ROAD RUNNERS - SEASON 2 - FEBRUARY 20
» Kavalek in Huffington: The Road to Chess Mastery
» Petit Le Mans - Road Atlanta - October 17-20
» TORA MSA GT Meeting 8 - Road Atlanta (21st Oct)

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Super Nuke Bros. Forum :: General :: General Discussion-
Jump to: